Since 2002 · Anti-counterfeit · Specialty · Functional Ink Manufacturer Tel: 0755-84672518 Mr. Chen +86-13510514531 · Mr. Wang +86-13510998453 Email: 29888248@qq.com

产品系列: <span>防伪系列</span>

Home › 产品系列: <span>防伪系列</span>

Covert security: invisible to counterfeiters, verifiable in seconds

Security inks solve a two-sided problem: make life hard for counterfeiters, and give the inspector a clear answer within seconds. All four products in this series share one trait — they are condition-triggered. Under normal light they look like ordinary print; the mark only appears under UV, under IR excitation, above a temperature threshold, or in the dark. That trait is itself the security value: a counterfeiter does not know where to look, or what condition to test with.

The four technologies are fundamentally different, and they do not substitute for one another. UV fluorescent ink (254nm shortwave / 365nm longwave) is the most economical and the easiest to verify — a banknote detector or a UV torch is enough — which suits high-volume labels, hang tags and documents. IR excitation ink requires dedicated detection equipment and sits at a higher security tier, typically for high-security IDs and negotiable instruments. Thermochromic ink reacts to body heat, warm water or ambient temperature, so end users can verify it themselves — closer to visual security plus marketing interaction. Glow-in-the-dark ink relies on rare-earth long-afterglow pigment and is essentially a functional marking; its security value is lower than the other three. In practice the most common architecture is UV fluorescent as the base layer, with IR or thermochromic added on top to form a dual-channel system.

When covert security underperforms, the cause is usually the substrate rather than the ink. Paper containing fluorescent whitening agents glows under UV on its own, which masks the fluorescent mark and makes it look dim or absent. Please send the actual substrate and we will print a proof on your material before deciding whether a different stock or an opaque base coat is needed. Fluorescent colour, excitation wavelength and variable-data coding are all configurable; printed proofs are available for press trials.

Frequently Asked Questions

Selection, detection, printing and ordering — answered.

What is the difference between UV fluorescent ink and IR excitation ink?
The difference is the verification condition and the security tier. UV fluorescent ink reveals colour under 254nm or 365nm UV light and can be checked with an ordinary banknote detector or UV torch — low cost, suitable for high-volume labels and hang tags. IR excitation ink is completely invisible under normal conditions and requires a dedicated IR excitation source plus a viewer, giving a higher security level for high-security IDs and negotiable instruments. The two can be layered into a dual-channel system.
What equipment is needed to verify these security inks?
UV fluorescent ink: a standard banknote detector or UV torch, with a result in seconds. IR excitation ink: a dedicated infrared detection device. Thermochromic ink: no equipment at all — body heat, warm water or ambient temperature triggers it. Glow-in-the-dark ink: no equipment — it charges in light and glows in the dark.
The fluorescent mark looks dim on paper containing fluorescent whitening agents. What can be done?
Fluorescent whitening agents glow under UV themselves and overpower the ink — this is substrate interference, not an ink defect. There are two routes: switch to a substrate free of whitening agents, or print an opaque colour base coat first to block the interference before applying the fluorescent layer. Send us your actual substrate and we will proof on it before recommending a route.
Can you supply samples?
We provide printed proofs free of charge for press trials; physical sample shipments are not free. Fluorescent colour, excitation wavelength and variable-data coding are configurable. Export quotations exclude freight and taxes, and delivery is within mainland China.

Still deciding? See the full 12-ink selection comparison table →